Agricultural Sector Emissions Pushed Out til Who-Knows-When

By Celsias

3 comments

Posted on July 2, 2012. Listed in:

 

The Government has further delayed the introduction of a number of elements of the ETS and has basically pushed making any decisions about the country's biggest polluter out until 2015.
cows Businesses in the ETS were to have faced higher costs from 2013 but the Government has decided the economy can't afford the environment, and they will stay as is.
Weird don't you think that the economy and the environment are somehow different , especially in a country which draws its wealth from its environment ?
Our biggest polluter, and biggest beneficiary of not paying their share of carbon emissions is the agricultural sector. They were due to enter the scheme in 3 years time, but now they have no date at all.
John Key says it is important that New Zealand does its share, but defended the decision to delay making changes to the scheme.And our share, apparently is to be one of the biggest per capita emitters in the world and do nothing at all about the sector that puts us there. 
"It's important, I think, that we have an Emissions Trading Scheme to put a price on carbon, but now is not the right time in a very globally uncertain economic environment to put more costs on households and more costs on consumers and businesses." 
ets science media centre So every time there is economic uncertainty in the world we delay the introduction of our ETS ?
Mr Key says the delay in making changes to the scheme will cost the Government(read all of us )  $80 million a year, but will have no impact on the target of reaching surplus by 2014/15.
Tim Groser , Minister for Climate Change Issues spelt out the key changes like this:

 

 

·         Keeping the ‘one-for-two’ obligation in place until after this year. This means participants in the scheme will continue to surrender units for half the carbon they emit;

·         Maintaining the $25 ‘fixed-price option’ until at least 2015, which caps the price firms will face if carbon prices begin to rise internationally;

·         Introducing off-setting for pre-1990 forest land owners, and allocating the full second tranche of compensation where off-setting is not taken; and

·         Leaving agricultural emissions out of the ETS until at least 2015.

“We have considered in-depth the recommendations of the ETS Review Panel, listened to what those affected by the ETS are saying, and reviewed what our trading partners are doing.  We also considered feedback through community consultation, including written submissions, a series of regional meetings, and hui"said Tim Groser 

 carbon footprint bigstock The agricultural sector at just on half of all our GHG emissions provides New Zealand with a very unusual carbon footprint. We have just seen Australia introduce a price on carbon for the big emitters. We on the other hand have decided that the big emitters of our national carbon footprint should be exempt from any cost of carbon emissions.

Why ? Apparently it's hard to offset, and yet the carbon forestry scheme has been working very well. What's happened to the big methane research centre that we established ?  It's hard - so the biggest polluters get to be subsidised by "mom and dad" who don't really have much of a hope of buying shares in those state owned assets , but do get to subsidise the carbon emissions of the agricultural sector.

Feeling good about that ?

Shucks, for some reason no...

Suddenly the Australian version doesn't seem so bad after all.

Second image: courtesy of Science Media Centre 

3 comments

If you see any unhelpful comments, please let us know immediately.

As a farmer I find this deeply embarrassing and totally counterproductive.

Written in July 2012

No surprise here, really.
It's not that we can't afford it, it's that we have an economic system which rewards bad outcomes, and a political system which makes it convenient to put off unpopular decisions to the next government.
Therefore it's clear that nothing will ever happen until the costs of not acting will be clear to everyone (when it is too late).

Written in July 2012

Mr February

I think we have a spam problem in the comment moderation.
As well as the spam problem in our Government's choices on climate change policy and design of the emissions trading scheme.

Written in November 2012

Add a comment
  • to get your picture next to your comment (not a member yet?).
  • Featured project

    View now ›

    Sponsors

    Featured organisation

    View now ›