Not to buy another vehicle, 22°

Image by Robert

My goal and hope is not to buy another car or van, especially a BMW, after reading this statement >The BMW Group’s entire business model is grounded in sustainability. Which may be why BMW has topped its category in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index for the last four consecutive years.<I wonder if the insanity will ever stop. There is no way a BMW can be built without destroying 'your' children's environment. OR the roads it needs to get from point A to B OR the fuel it has to burn moving on the oil based road. I suggest a small light car as they are easier to push or pull with a horse, where as BMWs etc are bloody heavy. Equally electric cars are a waste of energy and also kill the environment for younger* generations they use so much energy/oil during manufacture that you would have to drive 150,000 miles (US stat) before you get an 'environmental' return, compared to driving a Hummer.

* I say younger as I do not think there will be many 'future' generations )
Apathy rules I'm afraid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlYTJ9JHY4A

Robert Atack
www.oilcrash.com

5 comments about this action

I'm sorry Rob. We committed to this action for 14 years, but as our family grew we needed larger and larger cars for getting aorund. By the time we got the V6 Voyager, the fuel bill was getting enormous.
So we bus to work, the kids bike to school, we walk where possible (we did the Oxfam Trailwalk this year too).
But ... last month I finally broke the drought and bought an fuel efficient run about.
I know, I know, but when you're driving a tank at 14 l/100km just to drop off one child to dance classes, you soon realise a second car is a good idea.
So I applaud your action, but sometimes a second car makes sense.

in August 2009

You don't have to say sorry to me Vin.
But maybe on the next trip to dance classes you could point out to the kids how much of their environment you are stuffing up.
It doesn't matter in the end as Derrick Jensen says individual action is futile it will take true government action ... and we are not talking 10 - 20 % reduction by 2020, we are talking about draconian actions that democracy will not tolerate ... such as 30 year ban on having children, ban on all immigration, 40 - 80 % reduction in emissions .. now, a MASSIVE education program. instant halt on all road building, cancel the rugby world cup, stop all overseas trips for any govt sponsored sports people or anyone really, in fact a ban on flying full stop, stop importing or exporting most things especially food or anything that takes minerals etc out of NZ.
We should impose a similar system the US has imposed on Cuba .... now that would wake up the GDP (general dumb public) ...... anything short of the above suggestions and you might as well drive your kids over a cliff, as learning Morris dancing will not do a bloody thing to help them survive going forward, but maybe they could then join the Greed Party with all those new skills.
"If a path to the better there be, it begins with a full look at the worst" - Thomas Hardy 1887”.
I made this up the other day ) .............Everything on the earths crust is toast.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009...
SNIP
Published on Wednesday, July 8, 2009 by Orion Magazine
Forget Shorter Showers: Why Personal Change Does Not Equal Political Change

by Derrick Jensen

Would any sane person think dumpster diving would have stopped Hitler, or that composting would have ended slavery or brought about the eight-hour workday, or that chopping wood and carrying water would have gotten people out of Tsarist prisons, or that dancing naked around a fire would have helped put in place the Voting Rights Act of 1957 or the Civil Rights Act of 1964? Then why now, with all the world at stake, do so many people retreat into these entirely personal solutions?

Part of the problem is that weve been victims of a campaign of systematic misdirection. Consumer culture and the capitalist mindset have taught us to substitute acts of personal consumption (or enlightenment) for organized political resistance. An Inconvenient Truth helped raise consciousness about global warming. But did you notice that all of the solutions presented had to do with personal consumption—changing light bulbs, inflating tires, driving half as much—and had nothing to do with shifting power away from corporations, or stopping the growth economy that is destroying the planet? Even if every person in the United States did everything the movie suggested, U.S. carbon emissions would fall by only 22 percent. Scientific consensus is that emissions must be reduced by at least 75 percent worldwide. END SNIP

in August 2009

Depending on your circumstances, I think it can make complete sense to have more than one vehicle available to you - so that you can use the most appropriate vehicle for each trip.

Ideally several households would share access to the 'stable' of vehicles so that not every suburban garage has two or three vehicles in it.

Personally I have a small motorbike, my partner has an even smaller scooter, and he also has a car that is only used for long trips out of town or when we need to carry a lot of passengers or equipment.

If it wasn't for the car we wouldn't be able to visit our families in other towns, we wouldn't be able to car-pool to events and I wouldn't be able to give lifts to my brother (who uses a wheelchair to get around). As much as I like the idea of never buying another vehicle, I will almost certainly do so!

in August 2009

Lindis, you are a model citizen

in August 2009

An ambitious action, but definitely a hard one particularly in NZ. We survived without owning a car for 4 years in London and almost 3 years in New York. Within 1 week of getting back to NZ, we had to buy a car. :-(

in September 2009

Featured project

View now ›

Sponsors

Featured organisation

View now ›